SugarCRM vs Salesforce – Evaluation
SugarCRM vs Salesforce – User-Friendly Upgrades
This article discusses the SugarCRM vs Salesforce and their varying strategies – including upgrading.
SugarCRM Features have been gaining a lot of credit lately, and the reason is that it has been engineered with User adoption in mind. Many businesses are being burdened by the fact that their CRM Solutions would have to be greatly customized in order to even begin the implementation. Out of the box, many CRM’s are simply not user friendly. This is also true with many CRM Upgrades, where users are forced to accept their product upgrades without even needing them. This situation has been made easier to handle for SugarCRM Version 5 users, where a new framework for development was introduced to make changes handy and safe. This framework allows the users to plot their own timelines for the upgrading of their system. This is important, especially if the goal is to keep the system in perfect tandem with the growing operations of the company.
Salesforce.com Upgrades: Forcing Users to Upgrade
Salesforce.com CRM users are being forced to accept service and product upgrades according to the schedule prescribed in the subscription. This means that regardless of the timeline set by the user for its business, it would still not account for the fact that Salesforce will still implement it on the software because of its own timeline. On the other hand, every SugarCRM subscription also comes with a prescribed schedule but its difference lies in the fact that users can delay the CRM upgrade to avoid possible interference with existing mission-critical projects. This means that Sugar customers can run their CRM according to their own schedule.
“Sugar 6 is awesome! We love the look and feel, and it is so easy to navigate. It was a quick and seamless upgrade – and the new user experience is a great addition to the existing benefits we are seeing with SugarCRM.”
~ Drew Sellers, vice president of operations with NBA affiliate team the Utah Flash
With this pricing tool, you will be able to compare the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) of more than 10 of the top CRM systems.
The comparison calculator includes the following CRM software systems: Salesforce.com, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, SugarCRM, Saleslogix, Sage CRM, Sage ACT, and more…
You will be able to plug in your numbers and compare the results between various CRM systems. With this tool, you will be able to identify the key TCO line items that are relevant for any CRM implementation. We have also included data for comparing CRM software systems such as Microsoft CRM, Salesforce.com, SugarCRM, Sage CRM, Sage SalesLogix and more. You will be able to view the 3 Year and 5 Year Total Cost of Ownership for both SaaS (Online/On-Demand) and Licensed (On-premise) pricing models.
Cost line items include:
- License/User price
- Hardware (incl. Server and Users)
- and more…
With this excel tool, you will be able to view the various price factors in the Online and On-Premise CRM deployment models.
This tool addresses various CRM deployment models, including (a) Online vs On-Premise, (b) SaaS vs Licensing and (c) Hosted vs Installed CRM.
With this tool, you will also be able to plug in your numbers and compare the results between various CRM implementation options. This tool was created by CRM gold partners – and is now available to our readers.
CRM Evaluation Webinar: Microsoft CRM 2011 vs Salesforce.com
This comparison between Salesforce.com and Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 will assist you in your CRM evaluation. To view the on-demand webinar, click the image below.
Locations for CRM Consulting and Training
If you need assistance in finding the best CRM implementation partner in your region, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Simply fill out the form and detail your message in the “Message” field. We have CRM partners in all regions in the United States, including the following cities:
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and San Antonio, Texas
Incoming CRM search terms:
- sugarcrm versus salesforce
- salesforce sugarcrm comparison